You're arguing over the usage of dangerous, which was perfectly valid, as if it were a binary term? I don't get it. It was never used as such. I gave you a samp

You're arguing over the usage of dangerous, which was perfectly valid, as if it were a binary term? I don't get it. It was never used as such. I gave you a sampling of data and you want to continue off an example left off the sampling. So just add it? Who cares? > It seems you're upset about something I said that you disagree with and are using hostility instead of reason. You made a statement that was extreme and never supplied a source. At this point you're just trying to troll and branch the argument down paths that are unrelated. Just go back to reddit. If you want to have a real, intellectual discussion about topics you yourself brought up then you need to provide source. Trying to find irrelevant faults just make you look like a troll. Have fun arguing with yourself.