4 ms·
This looks like an older version of the file. I don't know where to find an easily-linkable online copy of the current one, but it's the "definitions.units" fi
by Sniffnoy 11y ago
This looks like an older version of the file. I don't know where to find an easily-linkable online copy of the current one, but it's the "definitions.units" file included in GNU Units.
- dsp1234 11y agohttp://fossies.org/linux/units/definitions.units http://fossies.org/linux/units/definitions.units home page at https://www.gnu.org/software/units/ https://www.gnu.org/software/units/ full source code at http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/units/ http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/units/
- phaer 11y agoLatest release: http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/units/units-2.12.tar.gz http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/units/units-2.12.tar.gz Link for the lazy: https://gist.github.com/phaer/44bd758154fca29d6b38 https://gist.github.com/phaer/44bd758154fca29d6b38
- maxerickson 11y agoIt overlaps with it a great deal, but it is not simply that file. Quoting: This file is adapted, modified, and extended from the units database for use with GNU units, a units conversion program by Adrian Mariano adrian@cam.cornell.edu, who did a damn fine job collecting much of this.
- btilly 11y agoThe most important modification being the editorializing, which is most of the value to be found in reading this version. :-)
- Sniffnoy 11y agoAh, I see. Yes, I'd missed the editorializing -- which I do think is worth reading (especially about the candela), now that it's been pointed out (though I do think he's wrong about bits and Hertz). For what it's worth, though, it appears to be modified from an older version of the file; some of the editorializing would be out of date if it used an up-to-date version.