First of all, him being the "president and CEO of the Interactive Advertising Bureau" renders any potential discussion based on that statement invalid anyhow.

First of all, him being the "president and CEO of the Interactive Advertising Bureau" renders any potential discussion based on that statement invalid anyhow. Secondly, what is there to discuss in the first place? He certainly is free not to use any adblockers, just as everyone else is free to use (or not use) them as well. Whats next? Discussing the use of black vs dark blue socks? Unless OF COURSE, he is suggesting to ban, block, "outlaw" adblockers. THAT would be a completely different issue and an actual war/attack on free choice, the very thing is appears to criticise.