4 ms·

> Call it what you like. The point is that clear separation between logic and markup can be done and is valuable. You concede the original point. To your new

by munro 11y ago

> Call it what you like. The point is that clear separation between logic and markup can be done and is valuable. You concede the original point. To your new point, saying something is valuable doesn't make it valuable. Why? It decreases cohesion, which is not good. > Any web page that has inputs or controls is necessarily stateful - otherwise where does the input go? If this is a serious question, it's too far off any original point to teach you unfamiliar concepts. Learn about what stateless, declaratively, & imperatively UI means so there aren't strawmans, and so you can weigh in on these discussions. > There's nothing imperative about it. Have you looked seriously at Wicket or are you just throwing buzzwords around? Please do not dilute conversations on here by name calling. Imperative & state are basic computer science terms... o_O

lmm 11y ago
> You concede the original point. No. Your original claim was that you need to mix logic and layout. You don't. > If this is a serious question, it's too far off any original point to teach you unfamiliar concepts. Learn about what stateless, declaratively, & imperatively UI means so there aren't strawmans, and so you can weigh in on these discussions. It's not me who needs to learn what those words mean. Either you're just trolling, you don't understand the terms, or you don't understand wicket.
- munro 11y ago
  If you disagree with something I said, please disagree with it directly with reasoning, without name calling, ad hominem, or strawmans, at the exact thread. If I use terms incorrectly, correct me, and better yet, give an ironman of what I was trying to say.
  - lmm 11y ago
    To the extent that react is "stateless" (which I don't consider an accurate or useful term, because UI is inherently stateful - the meaningful distinction is whether state is managed or pervasive) so too is Wicket. That is to say, you declare what your UI looks like as a function of the model values. There is no "imperatively updating" and no increased complexity.

by munro 11y ago

lmm 11y ago

> You concede the original point. No. Your original claim was that you need to mix logic and layout. You don't. > If this is a serious question, it's too far off any original point to teach you unfamiliar concepts. Learn about what stateless, declaratively, & imperatively UI means so there aren't strawmans, and so you can weigh in on these discussions. It's not me who needs to learn what those words mean. Either you're just trolling, you don't understand the terms, or you don't understand wicket.

munro 11y ago
If you disagree with something I said, please disagree with it directly with reasoning, without name calling, ad hominem, or strawmans, at the exact thread. If I use terms incorrectly, correct me, and better yet, give an ironman of what I was trying to say.
- lmm 11y ago
  To the extent that react is "stateless" (which I don't consider an accurate or useful term, because UI is inherently stateful - the meaningful distinction is whether state is managed or pervasive) so too is Wicket. That is to say, you declare what your UI looks like as a function of the model values. There is no "imperatively updating" and no increased complexity.