> If capital is cheaper to acquire or create, it means fewer people are needed to pool money to attain it. In other words, capital ownership becomes more concen

> If capital is cheaper to acquire or create, it means fewer people are needed to pool money to attain it. In other words, capital ownership becomes more concentrated as a result. I see how that would cause ownership of a specific asset (e.g., one program) to become more concentrated, but wouldn't the lower barrier to entry cause ownership to become less concentrated market-wide?