> I have no clue if "zero ui" is actually a good thing or whatever "Zero UI" is nothing, it doesn't mean anything, because it goes against the definition of UI

> I have no clue if "zero ui" is actually a good thing or whatever "Zero UI" is nothing, it doesn't mean anything, because it goes against the definition of UI. Even worse, it kind of creates some confusion as to what is a UI at first place. And then uninformed people (journalists) will start thinking "when there is no screen, there is no UI", which is straight out false, and spread that lie. There is nothing new here, only people that take advantage of the ignorance of others for marketing purposes, labeling something old as brand new. That's dishonest, at best. So yes, this "Zero UI movement" is pure bullshit, and it needs to be called out for what it is. The only invention here is the buzzword.