3 ms·
I guess it depends how much quality control you want to implement. Author seems to be suggesting next to zero user acceptance testing, which is probably fine fo
by bottled_poe 11y ago
I guess it depends how much quality control you want to implement. Author seems to be suggesting next to zero user acceptance testing, which is probably fine for small applications.
- kyllo 11y agoEspecially when your users are your employees, so they have no choice but to "accept" whatever system you make them use.
- skwashd 11y agoI'm sorry you were left with the impression that I was advocating little or no quality control. I believe in quite the opposite, but I don't think someone should need to conduct manual testing and sign off at the end of the process. Human testing should occur during development. Users should play with prototypes and provide feedback, humans should help define automated acceptance tests. A machine should run the tests and throw the code over the wall, people are no longer needed for that.