5 ms·
The thing about alternative modes of user interaction, which seems to be most of what we’re really talking about here, is that we didn’t get to where we are tod
by Chris_Newton 11y ago
The thing about alternative modes of user interaction, which seems to be most of what we’re really talking about here, is that we didn’t get to where we are today by accident.
As long as humans have eyes and trichromatic vision similar to what we have today, a 2D RGB display is going to be a useful medium for presenting information for us.
As long as humans have ears, audible presentation and vocal interaction are going to be of limited usefulness because they are so disruptive for everyone else.
As long as humans have small, light fingers with fine motor control, devices like keyboards and mice and joysticks and trackballs and touchpads and touchscreens are going to be useful for controlling a system.
As long as humans have big, heavy arms with imprecise muscle movement, 3D spacial interactions with sweeping, dramatic arm movements will belong in the movies, where the hero can find the bad guy in a few seconds instead of three days of tedious searching.
No doubt presentation and interaction methods will continue to evolve, but fundamentally we humans will probably still have the same senses and motor skills in ten or twenty years that we have today, so radical change seems unlikely in the near future. It’s also hard to believe that either natural language processing or data mining and predictive systems will advance so much in the next few years that they will supplant other means of interacting with technology rather than supplementing them, so again it’s hard to see established tools like keyboards and screens going away any time soon.
- bsder 11y agoPeople also forget that vocal communication is "imprecise and slow". Even with the most powerful AI on the planet--other humans. I can go through your crappy PowerPoint deck in 5 minutes, or I can listen to you drone on badly for 60 minutes. I ban PowerPoint from meetings where I need communication to occur explicitly because of this. Of course, if we're just "flying the colors" for management, then PowerPoint is required.
- the_af 11y ago> People also forget that vocal communication is "imprecise and slow". Even with the most powerful AI on the planet--other humans. This. It drives me nuts that some people still think a voice recognition interface -- even if that's at all possible in the more general case -- is necessarily the best UI. Or gestures. Look, in a lot of cases I wouldn't want to have a person listening to me while I explain what I want done as I wave frantically. Humans are notoriously bad at understanding some sorts of instructions. Why would I want to introduce this ambiguity to my computer?
- alvin0 11y agoTrue, communicating thoughts vocally is imprecise and slow. But hearing does have some more parallell-ness in a sense. A fire alarm is a good interface to alert to a fire. It is still in the background, and you can talk to someone over it, but you are constantly aware of it.