4 ms·
Except the -scope part means that the foreach-ness is indicated by the template, so people consider that to be not-logicless. I understood your claim fine. I'm
by mst 11y ago
Except the -scope part means that the foreach-ness is indicated by the template, so people consider that to be not-logicless.
I understood your claim fine. I'm trying to explain why it might be considered false (and I did already say I consider the arguments each way basically hair splitting).
- toolz 11y agoInteresting, I've never imagined an identifier could be labeled as logic. There is no need for a scope, if you mean that the outer identifier is logic. Anything could be the identifier and inside the processor you could define anything to be the outer layer. You could flip data-attr and data-scope just as easily, so I'm not sure where there could ever be an argument that those things represent logic rather than markup. Either way, I _think_ I have a better understand of potential conflicting views. Thanks for taking the time to explain.