3 ms·
It is always either neutral or negative is probably what OP meant here. I.e. it is never in your interests to have such a clause. In theory, you could use that
by Afton 11y ago
It is always either neutral or negative is probably what OP meant here. I.e. it is never in your interests to have such a clause.
In theory, you could use that clause as leverage for a better salary or benefits or other positive outcomes, but in practice I doubt that there are any cases of employment contracts where you give up this right for anything other than 'the right to sign the employment contract'.
- onetwotree 11y agoI feel as though being a stickler for your contract rights places you in a bit stronger negotiating position, if only on a purely psychological level.
- umanwizard 11y agoIt's often very positive because by signing the contract, you get a potentially desirable job. I agree that these sorts of clauses should be banned, but "never sign a mandatory arbitration clause" is overly simplistic advice.