i'd argue pauli(o) already answered the question of whether all snowflakes are wholly unique that said, this tech demo is an awesome display of environmental c

i'd argue pauli(o) already answered the question of whether all snowflakes are wholly unique that said, this tech demo is an awesome display of environmental control and deterministic macro processes i am unsure why people are so fond of fetishising the "we're not special" mantra it seems an agenda driven denial of reality with dubious consequences relying on the agreement of the definition of words without actually defining them i suppose the problem lies in the innate ambiguity of the word 'special' and in the case of the article's headline 'alike' how alike? because in the examples in the videos i can see with only my eyes that these twins have minute differences so the question arises: are the inconsistencies an issue of mechanical precision? (o) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_exclusion_principle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_exclusion_principle