3 ms·
TBH, I prefer Hg regardless. I only use git when forced to to interact with a project on GitHub. As for replacement, I don't think anyone wants that. Two wid
by rjbwork 11y ago
TBH, I prefer Hg regardless. I only use git when forced to to interact with a project on GitHub. As for replacement, I don't think anyone wants that. Two widely used open source DVCSes is a great thing.
- ufo 11y agoHave you ever tried out hg-git? It lets you interact with github repos using mercurial.
- lucaspottersky 11y agoi've never tried. but i usually refrain from putting more technology than needed to reach my end goals. less is more, in this case. :P
- ufo 11y agoOn the other hand, I find git's command line interface very confusing so less trips to the man pages is also more :P
- kevin_thibedeau 11y agoI've tried it during the transition from Google Code. It works well enough but it didn't handle orphaned branches (as used by Github pages) well and I had to provide credentials twice for every push for some reason.
- rjbwork 11y agoI have. TBH it was more trouble than it was worth, and I had some trouble with the initial setup. It was a couple years ago now though, so it's possibly gotten better.