18 ms·

Every inch of the earth has been mapped out by satellite and is available with perfect GPS navigation. Too late for that law.

• TazeTSchnitzel 11y ago
  Satellites have made images, but they haven't made proper street maps, which is what you actually need for navigation. Blurry textures on a globe won't tell you how to get to places unless you already know their GPS coördinates.
  • ttflee 11y ago
    TIL, diaeresis is not umlaut.
    • dkbrk 11y ago
      Huh. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diaeresis_%28diacritic%29#English https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diaeresis_%28diacritic%29#Engl... > The grave accent and the diaeresis are the only diacritics native to Modern English... The use of both, however, is considered to be largely archaic. The diaeresis mark is sometimes used in English personal first and last names to indicate that two adjacent vowels should be pronounced separately, rather than as a diphthong. Examples include the given names Chloë and Zoë... it is far less commonly used in words such as coöperate and reënter except in a very few publications—notably The New Yorker. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grave_accent#English https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grave_accent#English > The grave accent, although not commonly applied to any English words, is sometimes used in poetry and song lyrics to indicate that a vowel usually silent is to be pronounced, in order to fit the rhythm or meter. Most often, it is applied to a word ending with -ed. For instance, the word looked is usually pronounced /ˈlʊkt/ as a single syllable, with the e silent; when written as lookèd, the e is pronounced: /ˈlʊk.ɨd/ look-ed). It can also be used in this capacity to distinguish certain pairs of identically spelled words like the past tense of learn, learned /ˈlɜrnd/, from the adjective learnèd /ˈlɜrn.ɨd/ (for example, "a very learnèd man").
    • TazeTSchnitzel 11y ago
      It might be archaic usage, but I agree with The New Yorker that coöperative is much more elegant than co-operative or cooperative.
• cjslep 11y ago
  To support you, the USSR had mapped nearly the entire world (presumably with aid of satellites and GPS): "The Soviets made far more detailed maps of some parts of the world. They mapped all of Europe, nearly all of Asia, as well as large parts of North America and northern Africa at 1:100,000 and 1:50,000 scales, which show even more features and fine-grained topography." I sincerely doubt they have any of the China GPS offsets. http://www.wired.com/2015/07/secret-cold-war-maps/ http://www.wired.com/2015/07/secret-cold-war-maps/
  • TazeTSchnitzel 11y ago
    Sounds like their civilian maps did, though: > Worse, the maps for the masses were deliberately distorted with a special projection that introduced random variations. “The main goal was to crush the contents of maps so it would be impossible to recreate the real geography of a place from the map,” Postnikov tells me. Well-known landmarks like rivers and towns were depicted, but the coordinates, directions, and distances were all off, making them useless for navigation or military planning, should they fall into enemy hands. The cartographer who devised this devious scheme was awarded the State Prize by Stalin.
    • rdtsc 11y ago
      Yes those Soviet era maps were military and classified. They only ended up in popular circulation after a quick retreat, fuckup and corruption that happened when the Soviet forced retreated from the Baltic states. I've heard even US militaryused(uses?) some of those maps for parts of Africa or used then initially in Afghanistan. As nobody else has bothered much to go and cross reference and built detailed maps of those regions in that much detail.
      • kbart 11y ago
        My history teacher claimed she had seen one of these maps and accuracy was unbelievable, there were every minor remote woods path marked only known and used by locals.
  • jaza 11y ago