3 ms·
You may be better off serving images off Amazon S3. As to hosting providers, I have 4 years good experience with openhosting.com -- they provide virtual serve
by 1gor 19y ago
You may be better off serving images off Amazon S3.
As to hosting providers, I have 4 years good experience with
openhosting.com -- they provide virtual servers with root access etc, pay-as-you scale (starting $20 a month, then growing as your RAM /CPU/Disk/bandwidth grows). Another plus is that they sit on a very thick pipe.
- samwise 19y agoWe plan to jack some bandwidth from flickr and other photo sharing sites (legally). Amazon EC2 seems like a great option, but have issues with reliability and SQL.