7 ms·
The linked location in the article has nothing to do with HAARP and is some random point in the Pacific Northwest that made some Alex Jones enthusiasts go wild
by bri3d 11y ago
The linked location in the article has nothing to do with HAARP and is some random point in the Pacific Northwest that made some Alex Jones enthusiasts go wild in the year 2008.
On their forum they decided it "must be a FEMA camp or HAARP" because that's the sort of things Alex Jones enthusiasts do, but there's no evidence that there was ever anything at all at that location. Here's what it looks like now: https://www.google.com/maps/@46.0081454,-123.2584663,3262m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=en https://www.google.com/maps/@46.0081454,-123.2584663,3262m/d... .
HAARP itself did used to be blurry on Google Earth (in the 2008 timeframe), but it was due to poor aerial imagery coverage of that part of Alaska (probably caused by an airspace restriction), not specific censorship:
http://www.newsfocus.org/images/haarp_sat_pic.jpg http://www.newsfocus.org/images/haarp_sat_pic.jpg
And it's perfectly visible now:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/HAARP+Government+Research+Facility/@62.3897378,-145.1517578,1474m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1 https://www.google.com/maps/place/HAARP+Government+Research+...
Google Maps censorship is fascinating but this article is both low-value and incorrect. Does anyone know of a more well-sourced set of censored areas on Maps?
- apaprocki 11y agoFor the Oregon site, when I overlay energy asset data -- at the end of that road is large underground natural gas storage for the Northwest Natural Gas Co. Maybe related, maybe not. But probably not a conspiracy :)