>At which point you're just making the argument for not turning on the Large Hadron Collider. We don't know what would happen. It could create a black hole and

>At which point you're just making the argument for not turning on the Large Hadron Collider. We don't know what would happen. It could create a black hole and destroy the world. That's unfair. There's a plausible argument that this would be harmful, while there's far less plausibility that the LHC would be harmful. >There is only one way to find out. Somehow I don't think you mean "more experiments".