> This article is more about "how to find out what an MVP might be". I think that's it in a nutshell. I agree with you that the article is sloppy with the ter

> This article is more about "how to find out what an MVP might be". I think that's it in a nutshell. I agree with you that the article is sloppy with the term "MVP", and should instead be calling these steps in the process "experiments". On the one hand, their point about multiple experiments being required is an important one. On the other, it really should be the case that when someone claims to have built an MVP, that they have a product and have solid evidence that it's viable. (I suppose one can never know for sure that it was absolutely minimal.) So an experiment is not an MVP, but experiments are what one does having set out to build an MVP.