4 ms·
Yeah, I entirely agree. I think sports are a good example of this (because in most sports, it's much easier to measure performance than in programming). LeBron
by overgard 11y ago
Yeah, I entirely agree. I think sports are a good example of this (because in most sports, it's much easier to measure performance than in programming).
LeBron James, for instance (arguably the greatest basketball player in the world), isn't really 2x better at anything compared to other top basketball players. He can't run twice as fast or jump twice as high. He's just slightly better at everything. Small things can stack to a large degree. Like, how many programmers know the important keyboard shortcuts in their development environment? Obviously it doesn't take a genius to learn keyboard shortcuts, but shaving 5 seconds off operations here and there can have a huge effect when you start thinking about how that multiplies in timescales of weeks or months. (Not that knowing keyboard shortcuts makes you a great developer, just saying, seemingly minor advantages can be huge multipliers)
- petra 11y agoI think the keyboard example hints for something bigger. Yes it's a small example.But it may allow you to stay in the flow(and optimal focus) better than someone who'se looking around menus. And the effect is probably non-linear to effort. And it accumulates. Now every month you get to learn more/better than the other guy. So yes, similarly minor things can be huge multipliers , like you say.