2 ms·
They have the EME build for people who don't want the DRM stuff so why can't they just offer a build with unsigned extensions allowed in a similar way? Yes it
by kozukumi 11y ago
They have the EME build for people who don't want the DRM stuff so why can't they just offer a build with unsigned extensions allowed in a similar way?
Yes it gets messy but they are making it so. I don't want to use a non-release (i.e. possibly buggy) version just so I can sideload an unsigned extension.
Just offer a non-front-page build in the same way they do for EME and let's move on to more important things.
Seriously Mozilla waste so much time and energy discussing all this stuff when it is patently obvious what the right thing to do is.
- RubyPinch 11y ago> so why can't they just offer a build with unsigned extensions allowed in a similar way? From the article that you are commenting on > at which point unbranded builds based on [...] release will be provided for testing. The article was 3 paragraphs long.
- kozukumi 11y agoApologies, I didn't see release mentioned when I read the article.