4 ms·

skip paywall: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiJrvqq1L7KAhUUSmMKHStNAlUQqQIIHDAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.

• tyre 11y ago
  The "web" link below the title links there.
  • eridius 11y ago
    The "web" link just links to a google search for the phrase "Apple Veteran Overseeing Electric-Car Project Leaving Company". At the moment Google is surfacing the WSJ article as the first link in a section called "In the news", but that may not be true for anyone looking at this story in the future.
    • mikeyouse 11y ago
      For every article I've ever tried, entering the exact phrase of the WSJ article results in the top Google result being the article in question. I think it's pretty safe given WSJ's SEO work.
      • dredmorbius 11y ago
        And for virtually every WSJ post to HN, I cannot access copy via Google search. HN don't take kindly to flagging. But really, either play social or go home.
        • jrockway 11y ago
          If you really enjoy reading the WSJ, you could just pay for it, you know. Then no "hacks" are necessary.
          • dredmorbius 11y ago
            If WSJ want to restrict readership to subscribers only, there's no need to feed them hits via social platforms. There's a quid pro quo here. And no, actually, I'm not interested in supporting Murdoch/NewsCorp in the least.
    • nikdaheratik 11y ago
      But who is to say that "in the future" another more recent article may be more relevant to they're looking for?