34 ms·
Well-argued? His point if there is one is that: >> Unikernels are entirely undebuggable. For which evidence he provides the sound of some applause at some ra
by shawn-butler 11y ago
Well-argued?
His point if there is one is that:
>> Unikernels are entirely undebuggable.
For which evidence he provides the sound of some applause at some random conference and I don't believe is even remotely true or is so general to be vacuous.
Your notion of well-argued differs greatly from mine.
Unikernels solve an important class of problems that Joyent is interested in solving with another platform.. it's own.
I see no mention of a significant benefit of unikernels: their decreased attack surface.
There is a fairly new community web site at http://unikernel.org/ http://unikernel.org/ for those interested.
- chris_wot 11y agoDon't forget the following argument: https://twitter.com/bcantrill/status/690580959981211648 https://twitter.com/bcantrill/status/690580959981211648
- shawn-butler 11y agoYes losing more respect for the guy with every passing hour.
- rodgerd 11y agoDon't Google his exchanges with David Miller then.
- vezzy-fnord 11y agoThe comment about using it as a reference for an OS class greatly disturbed me. Hopefully it was facetious.
- chris_wot 11y agoOh - where did he say that?
- frankzinger 11y agoWell if you can't run more than one process then how are you supposed to debug your application?
- frankzinger 11y agoI see no mention of a significant benefit of unikernels: their decreased attack surface. The entire 4th paragraph of the article is about the decreased attack surface. Edit: OK, not the entire paragraph, but it covers the topic.