3 ms·
That's not a naturalistic fallacy. The author's claiming that our ancestors had lower incidence of bowel disease or were perhaps healthier in other ways. Feel f
by meowface 11y ago
That's not a naturalistic fallacy. The author's claiming that our ancestors had lower incidence of bowel disease or were perhaps healthier in other ways. Feel free to refute that claim, but don't attack a strawman.
- verbify 11y agoWell, the author has to back that claim first. The burden of proof is on the one who brings the original claim (despite modern advances in hygiene and medicine), not on me.