4 ms·
I'm far from understanding QM for any definition of "understanding", but from your key insight, I would interpret it as, "whenever you measure something, you ar
by saganus 11y ago
I'm far from understanding QM for any definition of "understanding", but from your key insight, I would interpret it as, "whenever you measure something, you are actually entangling with it".
Is this what you are trying to say, when you state they are both the same phenomenon? or what exactly does it mean for entanglement and measurement to be the same phenomenon?
It's actually a very interesting take on QM, from my limited understanding of it.
- lisper 11y ago"whenever you measure something, you are actually entangling with it" Exactly right, but there's a little more to it than that. Because you are entangling with it, all of the "mysterious" properties of measurement (Shroedinger's cat and whatnot) can all be understood in terms of entanglement, and in particular, in terms of what happens when you get large systems of mutually entangled particles.