3 ms·
I generally find this article lacking in anything beyond personal opinion. However, I think the kernel of the problem is hinted at when he writes about chemical
by Xophmeister 11y ago
I generally find this article lacking in anything beyond personal opinion. However, I think the kernel of the problem is hinted at when he writes about chemical elements (and the article it links to is more suggestive of this): That is, synthesis of new terms must be very difficult in Chinese -- due to the large number of homophones -- which is compounded by the inflexibility of the writing system.
If this is true -- I'm not a Chinese speaker, but I'm married to one and have had this discussion before! -- then that is a burden on development as it clearly makes communication of new ideas clumsy.
- rahimnathwani 11y ago"synthesis of new terms must be very difficult in Chinese" It's not. You just slam two existing characters together. So many possibilities. Computer? Electric brain. If you want a new individual character, just put them on top of each other and invent your own single character (like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duang https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duang) as long as you don't expect it to be added to unicode.