The author seems to have a kind of old century overconfidence in the value of the dollar. I hope he uses only one currency for pratical reasons. And I would ra

The author seems to have a kind of old century overconfidence in the value of the dollar. I hope he uses only one currency for pratical reasons. And I would rather read an article that use ratios between liquid/static moneys those corporations got instead of random values. (I'm one of those that believes static money has no value, had and/or may have, but in reality it's absolute zero).