5 ms·
This is the sentence in which I invoke my [Yale|Harvard|Princeton|Caltech|MIT] diploma and lay into you with a subtle ad hominem. This is the sentence in which
by carbocation 17y ago
This is the sentence in which I invoke my [Yale|Harvard|Princeton|Caltech|MIT] diploma and lay into you with a subtle ad hominem. This is the sentence in which I narrow the problem to 1% of its original scope, eliminating the most useful and difficult 99%. This is the sentence in which I then solve that 1%, invoking advanced statistical techniques as I do so. This is the sentence in which I act far more humble than my accomplishment merited.
- icey 17y agoHere is the comment where I come to talk about how this community isn't what it was once. This sentence is where I would compare this community to another popular online community which I frequent but refer to in a demeaning fashion on other sites.
- cperciva 17y agoThis is the comment where I point out that, based on the number of votes the submission has received, it seems that you're alone in considering this submission to an example of the decadence of Hacker News; and note that, in any case, the correct response is to flag the submission, not to complain about it in the comments.
- access_denied 17y agoThis is the sentence in which I try to steer the thread back to he original topic. This sentence is my backup in which I blather unrelated, anecdotal stuff from my workplace, because it just popped into my head and I have the slight feel that my first sentence won't meet his purpose.
- Semiapies 17y agoThis is a comment nobody actually really sees, because they skipped down the page when they saw the conversation indent this far over.
- RyanMcGreal 17y ago>lay into you with a subtle ad hominem This is the pedantic reply in which I suggest that you might actually be thinking of argumentum ad verecundiam rather than argumentum ad hominem. Edit: this is the edit in which I italicize the Latin terms above to make myself sound more erudite.
- carbocation 17y agoThis is the ashamed reply in which I falsely reinterpret my original sentence, claiming that I intended both argumenta. This is the sentence in which I emit additional additional argumenta, which I just looked up in Wikipedia.
- dkimball 17y agoThis sentence is the beginning of a long and tangentially relevant argument about the Crusades.