4 ms·

The string manipulation is good in Rust, but in Rust strings are unicode and characters are unicode codepoints. IRC is an ASCII protocol and so I went with usin

by VeilEm 11y ago

The string manipulation is good in Rust, but in Rust strings are unicode and characters are unicode codepoints. IRC is an ASCII protocol and so I went with using binary slices `[u8]` for parsing. For network stuff I used openssl[0] and std::TcpStream [1] I didn't use a GUI. I plan on using piston.rs[2] to build games but there are Qt, GTK+ and even Cocoa integrations for rust. [0] https://crates.io/crates/openssl/ https://crates.io/crates/openssl/ [1] https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/net/struct.TcpStream.html https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/net/struct.TcpStream.html [2] http://www.piston.rs/ http://www.piston.rs/

fpoling 11y ago
Yes, its a pity that Rust requires that strings must be UTF-8. Go designers got it right as their strings are just immutable sequences of bytes making them very suitable for network protocols and binary data.
- heinrich5991 11y ago
  That's what Rust has byte slices for: `b"abcdef"`
  - fpoling 11y ago
    One cannot use string library in Rust against byte slices. For example, regexp works only against strings making it unsuitable for processing, say, log files, that may contain non-utf8 bytes.
    - heinrich5991 11y ago
      Yea, also found that limitation of the regex library pretty annoying. But conceptually this has nothing to do with string slices being different from byte slices... It might encourage it though.
      - kbenson 11y ago
        FWIW, I think getting the underlying string representation right (and relatedly how it interacts with byte buffers/slices) is really hard. So far, I think Perl 6 probably has the most well thought out structure with regard to that, but they took a decade and a half and lots of testing to come up with what they did. Then again, how it works in Perl 6 is also a function of how the language functions, so it wouldn't be a a direct mapping of concepts, but there are some really good ideas there.
    - kibwen 11y ago
      This is somewhat incorrect, as Rust doesn't have a standard regex library. You're likely thinking of burntsushi's regex crate, which made its own decision to be Unicode-aware. There's no reason that someone couldn't come up with their own regex library (or fork burntsushi's, or just wrap an existing C regex library) that works as you desire.

by VeilEm 11y ago

fpoling 11y ago

Yes, its a pity that Rust requires that strings must be UTF-8. Go designers got it right as their strings are just immutable sequences of bytes making them very suitable for network protocols and binary data.

heinrich5991 11y ago
That's what Rust has byte slices for: `b"abcdef"`
- fpoling 11y ago
  One cannot use string library in Rust against byte slices. For example, regexp works only against strings making it unsuitable for processing, say, log files, that may contain non-utf8 bytes.
  - heinrich5991 11y ago
    Yea, also found that limitation of the regex library pretty annoying. But conceptually this has nothing to do with string slices being different from byte slices... It might encourage it though.
    - kbenson 11y ago
      FWIW, I think getting the underlying string representation right (and relatedly how it interacts with byte buffers/slices) is really hard. So far, I think Perl 6 probably has the most well thought out structure with regard to that, but they took a decade and a half and lots of testing to come up with what they did. Then again, how it works in Perl 6 is also a function of how the language functions, so it wouldn't be a a direct mapping of concepts, but there are some really good ideas there.
  - kibwen 11y ago
    This is somewhat incorrect, as Rust doesn't have a standard regex library. You're likely thinking of burntsushi's regex crate, which made its own decision to be Unicode-aware. There's no reason that someone couldn't come up with their own regex library (or fork burntsushi's, or just wrap an existing C regex library) that works as you desire.