4 ms·

I like PyQt except that it's a pain to deploy anything written in it on Windows—though to be fair, I haven't tried for a couple years! I wonder if PyQt works w

by PeCaN 11y ago

I like PyQt except that it's a pain to deploy anything written in it on Windows—though to be fair, I haven't tried for a couple years! I wonder if PyQt works with Cython. That could be interesting.

vetinari 11y ago
I used to have a good experience with py2exe in the past. We used it in production, to deliver exes to end users. Because it looks abandoned nowadays, I've tried pyinstaller recently. It worked OK, too; the only thing that was slightly annoying was pulling in the Windows 8/2012 (api-ms-win-*) style system dlls.
mfgs 11y ago
Lately I've been using Python/PyQt with Nuitka, which transpiles the Python to C++ and then compiles it into a standalone exe + dlls. It (more or less) just works too, very cool indeed!
- kyzyl 11y ago
  Hey -- I've got a question about that use case. So I'm familiar with Nuitka (and all the rest... ugh) but in my brief tests using it I couldn't really get it to work with any of my python code that did anything real. For example, if I had anything that used numpy (which is most of my code) or Qt, or a lib that uses opengl, it would either fail outright saying "can't find blarg" or it would spin forever. Now I understand that the process of transpiling something huge like numpy and then compiling it will be fairly demanding, but I've literally left this stuff running in a tmux session for a day or two and it showed now sign of ever finishing. I'm not asking you to debug my stuff or anything, but have you had a different experience? Is there a trick to getting Nuitka to build code that leverages the python ecosystem? I would really like to figure this out, because the alternatives are really quite terrible, IMO. If Nuitka can be made to work with build times less that a week, I think he's really on to something.
  - mfgs 11y ago
    Huh, strange. My standalone build sucked in numpy and PyQt4 (but not PySide) no troubles at all. I did have a minor problem with ctypes (explicitly importing _ctypes was required), but apart from that surprisingly smooth sailing. I have tried Cython briefly but Nuitka seemed a lot easier; just point and go. No modification to the source code needed and I ended up with a nice .exe and a bunch of .dll and .pyd files (including those for numpy and PyQt4). Build time was 30 minutes for a small-medium size application (25000 lines) in Python 2.7.

by PeCaN 11y ago

I like PyQt except that it's a pain to deploy anything written in it on Windows—though to be fair, I haven't tried for a couple years! I wonder if PyQt works with Cython. That could be interesting.

vetinari 11y ago

I used to have a good experience with py2exe in the past. We used it in production, to deliver exes to end users. Because it looks abandoned nowadays, I've tried pyinstaller recently. It worked OK, too; the only thing that was slightly annoying was pulling in the Windows 8/2012 (api-ms-win-*) style system dlls.

mfgs 11y ago

Lately I've been using Python/PyQt with Nuitka, which transpiles the Python to C++ and then compiles it into a standalone exe + dlls. It (more or less) just works too, very cool indeed!

kyzyl 11y ago
Hey -- I've got a question about that use case. So I'm familiar with Nuitka (and all the rest... ugh) but in my brief tests using it I couldn't really get it to work with any of my python code that did anything real. For example, if I had anything that used numpy (which is most of my code) or Qt, or a lib that uses opengl, it would either fail outright saying "can't find blarg" or it would spin forever. Now I understand that the process of transpiling something huge like numpy and then compiling it will be fairly demanding, but I've literally left this stuff running in a tmux session for a day or two and it showed now sign of ever finishing. I'm not asking you to debug my stuff or anything, but have you had a different experience? Is there a trick to getting Nuitka to build code that leverages the python ecosystem? I would really like to figure this out, because the alternatives are really quite terrible, IMO. If Nuitka can be made to work with build times less that a week, I think he's really on to something.
- mfgs 11y ago
  Huh, strange. My standalone build sucked in numpy and PyQt4 (but not PySide) no troubles at all. I did have a minor problem with ctypes (explicitly importing _ctypes was required), but apart from that surprisingly smooth sailing. I have tried Cython briefly but Nuitka seemed a lot easier; just point and go. No modification to the source code needed and I ended up with a nice .exe and a bunch of .dll and .pyd files (including those for numpy and PyQt4). Build time was 30 minutes for a small-medium size application (25000 lines) in Python 2.7.