2 ms·
The jsx part is a bit of saying "X is better than Y because I like X!" but I see the rest of the article as more about why he thinks React+Redux are harder to u
by jbergens 11y ago
The jsx part is a bit of saying "X is better than Y because I like X!" but I see the rest of the article as more about why he thinks React+Redux are harder to use. A lot of it has to do with the number of things to learn and functional instead of OO. The last part is a belief held by many developers.
I haven't tried Elm or Cycle in production but think our code would be much easier to work with if it were written in any of those that it is today with React. There might be other problems like stability and some special features we might miss or the learning period might be much longerthan I think but overall both alternatives looks better to me.
- mchahn 11y ago> I haven't tried Elm or Cycle in production but think our code would be much easier to work with if it were This is yet one more article that makes me want to try Elm. It has been mentioned more and more often here, but I don't know if its actual usage has grown as much.