4 ms·
That's exactly how it works. The example doesn't show more than one, but it will return multiple resolutions ranked with a confidence percent (the meaning of wh
by 0x09 11y ago
That's exactly how it works. The example doesn't show more than one, but it will return multiple resolutions ranked with a confidence percent (the meaning of which depends on the method) as long as it's above a reasonable threshold.
Usually multiple results are a misdetection -- for example heavily compressed JPEGs will mess it up pretty badly:
$ convert Lenna.png -quality 50 Lenna.jpg
$ resdet Lenna.jpg
given: 512x512
best guess: 448x384
all width height
448 (77.49%) 384 (90.19%)
384 (66.99%) 448 (89.78%)
320 (60.68%) 320 (72.54%)
388 (55.92%) 256 (56.43%)
445 (55.49%)
345 (55.47%)
242 (55.06%)
(the block-based nature of JPEG compression/quantization creates a similar zeroing effect along every 1/8 of the spectrum)
- joshu 11y agoSure. But I meant for each region, show the underlying resolution of that area. So like for FFT of a whole sample vs FFT of short periods to make a spectrogram.