3 ms·

Which part? Are you saying the roman or medieval warm periods dont exist?

• orf 11y ago
  The "It was warm 1000 years ago, so climate change is a lie" bit. Choice quote from the link: > "Even if the world were incontrovertibly warmer 1,000 years ago, it would not change the fact that the recent rapid rise in CO2 explains the current episode of warming more credibly than any natural factor does—and that no natural factor seems poised to offset further warming in the years ahead."
  • brc 11y ago
    I didn't write any of that. You have inserted words into my argument and then gone on to debate something I didn't say. There is no scientific argument about the fact that the roman and medieval periods were as warm or warmer than today, because there is a lot of evidence. Even the linked article acknowledged this fact.
    • yongjik 11y ago
      The graphs I found seem to disagree... https://www.skepticalscience.com/medieval-warm-period.htm https://www.skepticalscience.com/medieval-warm-period.htm http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/globalwarming/medieval.html http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/globalwarming/medieval.html > The various studies differ in methodology, and in the underlying paleoclimate proxy data utilized, but all reconstruct the same basic pattern of cool "Little Ice Age", warmer "Medieval Warm Period", and still warmer late 20th and 21st century temperatures.