4 ms·
It's been a few years but I also remember a program size restriction on the free compiler. Honestly, it's a difference in approach to tooling, Atmel took the a
by vvanders 11y ago
It's been a few years but I also remember a program size restriction on the free compiler.
Honestly, it's a difference in approach to tooling, Atmel took the approach of better, freely distributed tools. Now that they won't be around I don't know that Microchip will have a competitor in that space to keep them honest.
- jason_s 11y agohttp://www.microchip.com/pagehandler/en_us/devtools/mplabxc/ http://www.microchip.com/pagehandler/en_us/devtools/mplabxc/ nope, just optimization. >Now that they won't be around People in this thread keep talking like this is the "death" of Atmel. I don't see it changing much other than being guided by Microchip management to meet higher profit margins. If you think that Atmel's compilers and IDE's are going to be dropped overnight in favor of MPLAB X and Microchip compilers, you are almost surely mistaken; there's a big gap between architectures so it would be a lot of work to get Microchip tools to support Atmel parts.