12 ms·
I'd like for the observable community to finally settle on a minimal common interface (like Promises/A+ and later ES6 promises did) for observables. Maybe https
by spion 11y ago
I'd like for the observable community to finally settle on a minimal common interface (like Promises/A+ and later ES6 promises did) for observables. Maybe https://github.com/zenparsing/es-observable https://github.com/zenparsing/es-observable
Then maybe cycle.js could come with a more minimal implementation rather than having to bring in a library with a gigantic footprint and 100+ operators (https://github.com/Reactive-Extensions/RxJS/blob/master/doc/gettingstarted/categories.md https://github.com/Reactive-Extensions/RxJS/blob/master/doc/...)
- fuzionmonkey 11y agohttps://github.com/motorcyclejs https://github.com/motorcyclejs
- spion 11y agoAwesome, most.js was exactly what I was hoping for! Still, it would be best if all those operators were a separate library dependant on a single common interface (using ES7 bind operator for nice chainability maybe?)
- robwormald 11y agoThat's how RxJS 5 is set up, fwiw.
- spion 11y agoOh, cool. I think I'm finally sold on RxJS then. My only remaining beef with cycle.js is that components behave so differently from DOM nodes (which are not treated the same way as components), but I guess I can still give it a try.