3 ms·
We can't maintain something simple for a long time. Maybe that's human nature (or developers nature ), but the success of a framework is the start of its demise
by hugozap 11y ago
We can't maintain something simple for a long time. Maybe that's human nature (or developers nature ), but the success of a framework is the start of its demise. Excited contributors will try to "improve" it and that always ends up adding complexity to what was a simple and elegant solution.
Maybe the problem originates in the tendency to rate open source projects using metrics like number of commits. A simple and elegant project that does not have recent activity is labeled as dead and people stop using it, even if it works well.
- trowawee 11y agoI think the problem originates in people using the system to solve their actual problems. Most problems aren't simple, and therefore demand non-simple answers. (Tangent: this is also why todo list examples for frameworks are so damn silly.)