What a load of drivel. There is a set of writers who will always (always) take the contrarian view, just to drive clicks. She spends the first 4 paragraphs ta

What a load of drivel. There is a set of writers who will always (always) take the contrarian view, just to drive clicks. She spends the first 4 paragraphs talking about Perry Mason. And then just a couple, talking about Avery. Here's the problem with the case, as I saw it (I watched the entire 10 episodes over a week). The only physical evidence tying Avery to the murder was collected by the pair of detectives who least of everyone else were supposed to be there. How convenient! Secondly, to the evidence itself: if Avery did all the throat-slashing and raping, where is the evidence?? Surely they should find ONE speck of blood, or hair or skin cells or something??? Avery is such a genius that he can wipe all evidence of this massacre from a carpeted, cluttered bedroom (so badly cluttered that they couldn't find the key, sitting in plain sight, in 4 previous tries!), while leaving his own DNA around everywhere?? Same for the garage, where apparently she was shot: no blood, nothing. But there was blood from various deer carcasses of the past! And don't even get me started on the key! His DNA is on it ... but not hers, even though she drove it?!? And why is it the valet key? And how come the two suspect detectives immediately recognized it was the "right" key, even though they were in a f'in junkyard with a 1000 vehicles around? And his blood in the vehicle: even if you accept that it's his blood, where are the fingerprints?? Oh right: when it came to fingerprints, he was wearing a glove. Which, conveniently once again, allowed the blood to seep through in the right places. The author uses Brendan's statement that he helped his uncle put the body in the RAV4, hence the "sweat DNA", AFTER admitting that the confession was fake! Anyone who has watched the "confession" would be left with boiling rage at the interrogators. And she doesn't mention Len Kachinsky, the public "defender" who effectively railroaded Brendan? I could go on and on, but this article is pure drivel.