I feel like Syed probably did it. But that doesn't meet the standard of reasonable doubt. So I also think he should go free. If there's been evidence tampering

I feel like Syed probably did it. But that doesn't meet the standard of reasonable doubt. So I also think he should go free. If there's been evidence tampering and fraud at multiple levels in a case, it's really very very hard to meet the bar of "beyond reasonable doubt". If the police and DA can be proven (beyond a reasonable doubt) to have committed fraud in pursuit of the case, the door is opened to a lot of doubts that would normally be considered to be unreasonable. If the story is about the execution of the case and circumstances surrounding it, I feel like talking about bias in it's presentation of the outcome is a side-show. But I have my own biases so that's just my 2c.