You're spot on. The fact that the documentary is supposedly so one-sided is almost irrelevant, because it presents more than enough evidence to constitute reaso

You're spot on. The fact that the documentary is supposedly so one-sided is almost irrelevant, because it presents more than enough evidence to constitute reasonable doubt. On another note, I honestly can't believe that there's isn't some sort of law that would've prevented the sheriff's dept. from any sort of involvement in the case; there was such an obvious conflict of interests. I felt a little sick to my stomach when I heard about all the evidence they'd managed to procure, seemingly out of nowhere.