> There is no guessing, there is just a false sense of security. How is it false? > the uncertainty of a dynamic language is often an advantage How can uncer

> There is no guessing, there is just a false sense of security. How is it false? > the uncertainty of a dynamic language is often an advantage How can uncertainty ever be an advantage over certainty? > I've seen multiple times when bugs have been pushed to prod due to a false sense of security because "it compiled". That same program would have compiled just as well with a dynamically typed language. Except with potentially more bugs that the compiler didn't catch.