4 ms·
The major benefit of Meteor (at least for me) always was its quick bootstrap. So you want start coding or work on a mock-up? Just meteor create myapp and start.
by rafaquintanilha 11y ago
The major benefit of Meteor (at least for me) always was its quick bootstrap. So you want start coding or work on a mock-up? Just meteor create myapp and start. No boilerplate. No script and style tags. Heck, add bootstrap with a single line of command and you start with fine-grained classes! Sure you might need a database... don't worry! No need for schema, modeling, whatever, the server is already there and so the database.
Eventually you might want to scale and then, as in any library/framework/platform things will get a little more complicated. I don't see it as a problem, really.
Meteor always was opinionated and maybe some opinions were unpopular from the beginning (MongoDB, for example). But when you start adding multiciplity (React/Blaze/Angular for the frontend, Iron Router/Flow Router/React Router for routing, Meteor Package System/NPM...) you can lose the track. I'm afraid this is happening now.
- stared 11y agoI concur. The strong part of Meteor is its easy way start (both a project and diving in web dev). For experienced web developers, or people building bigger projects, easy start (and whole magics) is incompatible with high modularization and ability to easily tweak anything.