6 ms·

> I've yet to encounter an ad that has a hope in hell of manipulating me at all. If you know what "just do it", "the happiest place on Earth", "think different

• logingone 11y ago
  That works both ways. In the UK, presumably elsewhere too, there are long running themed adverts - they drive me nuts on the occasions that I don't hit the mute button soon enough. Brits will know the mongooses, and the two marathon runners, supposedly humorous - incessant, for years on end. Never, ever will I use those services.
  • J-dawg 11y ago
    Ugh, I'm right with you. When I renewed my car insurance recently, I avoided using either of the 2 comparison sites for exactly that reason. I wonder if brands ever do market research on the number of people actively repelled by their adverts.
    • Doctor_Fegg 11y ago
      BT. The combination of "bad boy" and overpaid UEFA thugs is enough to stop me buying any of their services.
    • monksy 11y ago
      The people who won't buy after the advert "wouldn't have bought it anyways"
  • zimpenfish 11y ago
    The mongooses? Or the meerkats? (I can't think of any mongoose adverts.)
    • chris_wot 11y ago
      Possibly a branding fail, at least for the parent commentator :-) I actually quite like the Meerkats.
• jhall1468 11y ago
  That depends on your definition of manipulation. Most people consider manipulation to be unfair or unscrupulous. Knowing a motto or the name of a brand is hardly either. I also happen to know what "get serious about social" refers to even though I've never seen an ad by them, nor have I ever been in a position which would make me a customer. There's nothing "sneaky" advertising techniques. They are well-known.
  • lbotos 11y ago
    I know my argument stands on shakey ground, but brand awareness (what you define as knowing a motto or brand name) is absolutely a form of manipulation. Apple has enough money, to buy enough ads, to be in enough places, that they can get their message to the masses. "Pear computers" (an imaginary computer startup who makes hardware better than apple but has no money) who don't have the power (money) to make that campaign happen absolutely have less manipulation leverage and will probably die unless they can figure out how to build a marketing ground swell (aka manipulate enough people to believe that their product _is_ superior and to use it.) See: Beats headphones.
    • caskance 11y ago
      Brand awareness is the most important part of apple's product. "Better hardware"? Nobody cares.
    • oldmanjay 11y ago
      Your argument didn't get any less shaky, unless you consider any interaction with an agenda, and therefore every interaction you will ever have, to be manipulation. If you do I feel a great amount of sympathy for you. You must feel inundated.
    • nemothekid 11y ago
      >but brand awareness (what you define as knowing a motto or brand name) is absolutely a form of manipulation. You're argument isn't shaky, its incomplete. How is this a bad thing? If my friend tells me "Intel makes good SSDs", I now have a brand and a reason to buy from them. Am I being "manipulated"? By your definition yes, I'm probably not going to buy a Samsung SSD, now knowing Intel is reliable. Is this bad? I don't know, I generally consider having information about a product I wish to purchase a good thing.
• jt2190 11y ago
  > If you know [random thing]... you've already been manipulated. If this is the proposed legal standard, then parents should be banned first.
  • ry_ry 11y ago
    "Here are some other great manipulation products you may be interested in..."
• owenversteeg 11y ago
  I agree for the most part, but there is a not insignificant part of the population for which those things don't matter. I know a good number of people who don't buy Nike products, don't own a Mac, and haven't been to any theme parks. For those people, whether or not they know the slogan doesn't matter: if you only drink water then 100 Coke vs Pepsi ads do nothing; if you run an obscure Linux distro you'll laugh at both the "think different" and "the world's most advanced operating system" ads; if you wear "the cheap black ones I think?" then the $90 Nikes won't get your dollar over the $40 New Balance shoes. I'm not saying that's the best way to live your life, but it certainly is one way to neatly sidestep the modern manipulation of ads.
  • flubert 11y ago
    >...certainly is one way to neatly sidestep the modern manipulation of ads. Things may be more insidious than that though. You may not drink Coke or Pepsi, but maybe you have friends or family members that do? I've certainly known people who didn't like to go to certain restaurants because they didn't serve Coke. Maybe you've also gone along with this at sometime in the past. Or maybe you've had to buy gifts for friends of your children, and they've had pressure procure name-brand items?
    • Karunamon 11y ago
      ..you realize that could be because Coke and Pepsi taste rather different and someone may like one to the exclusion of the other? What does that have to do with advertising?
      • flubert 11y ago
        Have you ever been to a restaurant where there served both Coke and Pepsi?
        • Karunamon 11y ago
          This comes down to franchise agreements, not advertising.
• zimpenfish 11y ago
  I know what "just do it" means but have only bought one (1) pair of Nike trainers in my life (out of, oh, 40+ pairs). I'm pretty sure I know where "the happiest place on Earth" is but it'll be a cold day in hell before I visit. Less manipulated, more just a basic cultural awareness, I'd say.
• philh 11y ago
  When I want to buy a card, I go to a shop named Cards Galore. I go there because the name makes me think that they sell cards. I know it exists because I pass it every day, and they have their name in big letters on the outside of their shop. Do you consider that I've been manipulated? More to the point, do you find anything unethical in this?
  • dota_fanatic 11y ago
    Manipulation, yes. Unethical, maybe? (when you look at its effect in aggregate) Honestly I just want all the advertising (be it physical (signage, billboards, smells, etc) or digital) to get out of my environment. It's almost always noise and it's ugly. There's no reason we couldn't build a hyper-connected system where if I'm looking for something, I can find it. I want socks? Ok, how many sock stores are local? Ok, what are these made of and who is their supplier, and how does their supplier get their product? (I don't want to support sweat-shop labor or non-sustainability, especially if I'm buying socks.) How have other people found these socks to work? I should be able to find what I need, which includes being able to understand how that product came to be (transparency). Products shouldn't find me. Ads are noise and we've got enough of that as it is. Would Nike, selling socks, be as successful when all is considered? I'd like to think humans care more for their home and, taking away all the psychological manipulation of ads, could begin to choose how to spend their money more intelligently. A man can dream... EDIT: To me your question raises the problem we should solve, which advertising kinda solves damn poorly. Get people who need something in touch with the people who can provide that something, and make it transparent for both parties as much as possible.
    • lsaferite 11y ago
      How is a store front with a sign having the store's name manipulation exactly?
    • jryle80 11y ago
      ok, let's assume such a hyper-connected system exists and ads disappear completely. You decide to buy socks. You find a supplier you like. Socks come in black and orange. You like black, but your wife prefers orange. She convinces you to change your mind with arguments such as "orange is more vibrant". Do you consider that a form of manipulation? is it unethical? The truth is, we as human being are constantly target of manipulation, always was, always will be. If not in the form of ads, then masqueraded in other more subtle forms. Would you rather know you're explicitly being subject of manipulation?
• mozumder 11y ago
  Yah, that's not "manipulation".
• nostrademons 11y ago
  You can overcome this by developing some habits of mind. First, never make a purchasing decision at the store or when approached by another person. Always decide that you'll buy something in the comfort of your own home, and try to wait on that decision. If you think you need something, stop, forget about it, and see if you need it next week. Only buy it if you still need it then. Second, always always comparison-shop for things. Read the reviews, identify which specs are most important to you, seek out competitors, and compare prices. The Internet (and now mobile apps) makes this so easy these days. I've never bought Nike or IBM, usually prefer local amusement parks or carnivals to Disneyland, and had to Google to realize that your last slogan applies to OS X (I think Xen when I hear "the world's most advanced operating system"). Consistently saved 80% of my income since I started working. I love ad-supported stuff, because it means other people pay for it rather than me.
• snowwrestler 11y ago
  But this moves the goal posts from your initial claim, which was "I adblock because I do not want to be manipulated into buying things I do not need." Choosing one brand over another when you want to buy beer is not nearly the same thing as being manipulated into buying beer when you don't actually want to.
• mirimir 11y ago
  I maybe know one of those ;)
• chiaro 11y ago
  Huh, looks like I've underestimated how effective isolating myself from that is. I could only identify the first one of those slogans with any confidence.
• ionised 11y ago
  The only thing that kind of advertising does is make me actively avoid that brand in the future out of sheer spite.