3 ms·
> If difficulties with specific countries, they should be explicitly named. That's easy to say when you aren't the person who'll be subject to criminal liabili
by SEMW 11y ago
> If difficulties with specific countries, they should be explicitly named.
That's easy to say when you aren't the person who'll be subject to criminal liability for violation of a gag order.
- sheepdestroyer 11y agoYou do see the big trust issue for the users here? Warrant Canaries, or something similar, become a necessity in today's world. The thing is : in this case we already know there were unspecified issues with anonymous countries. And they are now corrected I guess? And without much more details, that may well be enough of a dead canary for the security minded to turn to something else.