3 ms·

I don't really see what's wrong in your second example. You get exactly what you ask for. Sure, it could be improved by having 1) the "auto" keyword and b) o

I don't really see what's wrong in your second example. You get exactly what you ask for. Sure, it could be improved by having 1) the "auto" keyword and b) one project include which exactly defines which namespaces/aliases to use.

mc_hammer 11y ago
My original gripe was simple, if I declare bmp = class() should I really have to tell the compiler what the return type is? ideally no. >its now in 4 spots (header, function definition, and two spots on the same line in case the compiler cant find those?) also they added a ^ operator so thats cool. but I guess my gripe is every time I want a different taxonomy function I have to page up to the top of my CPP and type 42 keystrokes. (also I think I might have been missing an extra taxonomy there and its really 5 namespaces deep.)
- Aleman360 11y ago
  You can use C# or JavaScript if you don't like C++.