3 ms·
That quote is often cited, but it stymies the discussion. First of all because there are counterexamples. E.g. I think SQL is generally well-liked for its doma
by danieldk 11y ago
That quote is often cited, but it stymies the discussion.
First of all because there are counterexamples. E.g. I think SQL is generally well-liked for its domain and widely used.
Secondly, even if we complain about languages that are used, we can still distill and compare pros and cons. Speaking of C++ specifically - once Rust is in wider use, people will probably complain about it too. But we can describe in what regards Rust is safer objectively.
- js8 11y agoI don't like SQL. I think there could be a worthy successor to it. Something functional, typed, Haskell-like. Something that can incorporate other data processing paradigms, such as ETL, stream processing, map reduce and so on.