4 ms·

Doesn't a direct link cost more bandwidth? In which case does the one google ad on your site make the difference in cost/income? Further, does the ajaxian style

Doesn't a direct link cost more bandwidth? In which case does the one google ad on your site make the difference in cost/income? Further, does the ajaxian style hotlinking -- full credit and source link provided, constitute the same think most people think of for hotlinking (no credit, just images from someone else's site...).

there 17y ago
if the ajaxian page were just a link, there would be a percentage of people who would see the image/explanation and then decide not to click through. they weren't interested in it, and so they don't use up the guy's bandwidth. with the iframe, those people use up the bandwidth whether they want to see it or not.
boundlessdreamz 17y ago
The satisfaction of getting visitors is very important. Don't read his post as about costs alone. It is more like he paid the costs but got nothing in return. No visitors, exposure or fame :)
- sophacles 17y ago
  I tried to read it like that, but the part where his screenshot of the rickrolling, which includes the whole ajaxian post, has attribution to him, as well as a direct link to his site. Im not sure how that is not exposure/fame.
pyre 17y ago
On the other hand, this guy is seriously upset about this, but the Ajaxian staff feel that it's proper to just ignore him completely? Whether this guy has a point or not, ignoring him completely on both occasions (the first one where they didn't even give him attribution) shows that they are just a bunch of assholes. He also does give an example of another site (Smashing Magazine) seeing the post on Ajaxian and believing that the work was the original work of Ajaxian (or a staff member of Ajaxian) and not the work of the real author, so it seems reasonable for him to be upset about this. Especially since his work seems to only be driving fame/publicity for Ajaxian, and not himself.

there 17y ago

if the ajaxian page were just a link, there would be a percentage of people who would see the image/explanation and then decide not to click through. they weren't interested in it, and so they don't use up the guy's bandwidth. with the iframe, those people use up the bandwidth whether they want to see it or not.

boundlessdreamz 17y ago

The satisfaction of getting visitors is very important. Don't read his post as about costs alone. It is more like he paid the costs but got nothing in return. No visitors, exposure or fame :)

sophacles 17y ago
I tried to read it like that, but the part where his screenshot of the rickrolling, which includes the whole ajaxian post, has attribution to him, as well as a direct link to his site. Im not sure how that is not exposure/fame.

pyre 17y ago

On the other hand, this guy is seriously upset about this, but the Ajaxian staff feel that it's proper to just ignore him completely? Whether this guy has a point or not, ignoring him completely on both occasions (the first one where they didn't even give him attribution) shows that they are just a bunch of assholes. He also does give an example of another site (Smashing Magazine) seeing the post on Ajaxian and believing that the work was the original work of Ajaxian (or a staff member of Ajaxian) and not the work of the real author, so it seems reasonable for him to be upset about this. Especially since his work seems to only be driving fame/publicity for Ajaxian, and not himself.