4 ms·
Man, I remember when 33.6kbps was perfectly acceptable for participating in sites like Slashdot. I bet websites could provide appropriately low-bandwidth versi
by rspeer 11y ago
Man, I remember when 33.6kbps was perfectly acceptable for participating in sites like Slashdot.
I bet websites could provide appropriately low-bandwidth versions more easily than they could be vetted by Facebook's walled garden.
- jags-v 11y agoyep. Most of the sites are heavy because of tracking & user analytics part of which make make a huge chunk of the data download( pixel tracking , etc.)