4 ms·
That comment of mine wasn't the spiel I'd give to someone first trying to learn about the typical use of monads in a programming context, any more than I'd lect
by Chinjut 11y ago
That comment of mine wasn't the spiel I'd give to someone first trying to learn about the typical use of monads in a programming context, any more than I'd lecture a beginning programmer on the general theory of commutative rings while introducing integer and floating-point arithmetic (the latter not actually comprising a commutative ring...).
But teaching the use of monads to unfamiliar programmers wasn't my goal in that comment. I was just pointing out the accurate response to "Adjunctions aren't highly relevant to programming".
- bassislife 11y agoWhat if one simply says that a monad describes a pattern of morphisms composition ? Adjunctions being the plumbing ? (honest question, just trying to find a simple, grokkable definition)
- AnimalMuppet 11y agoFair enough. There's a place here for technical accuracy all the way down.