3 ms·
Part of the problem here is the legal environment created by Bayh–Dole, Stanford v. Roche, and their fallout. These universities do not play a substantive role
by tdaltonc 11y ago
Part of the problem here is the legal environment created by Bayh–Dole, Stanford v. Roche, and their fallout. These universities do not play a substantive role in the development of these technologies, but they get the IP because researcher are obliged to sign away their rights in order to get federal funds. Inventions are the natural property of their inventors, and we should make it harder to compel them to preemptively sigh away those rights.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayh%E2%80%93Dole_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayh%E2%80%93Dole_Act
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_University_v._Roche_Molecular_Systems,_Inc https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_University_v._Roche_M....
- gertef 11y agoStanford v. Roche seems to say that Bayh-Dole does NOT allow inventors to sign away their rights to the University or the Government.
- tdaltonc 11y agoAs I understand it, Stanford v Roche only said that the assignments that they made the researchers sign were not sufficiently stringent. And not universities just compel researchers to sigh a more explicit and complete assignment.