3 ms·

I agree with you about phone as a remote (lack of tactile feedback on button location pretty much kills it), but if you haven't used a chromecast extensively ye

I agree with you about phone as a remote (lack of tactile feedback on button location pretty much kills it), but if you haven't used a chromecast extensively yet I'd urge you to withhold judgement. It's not so much that it uses the phone as a "remote", since you're browsing the content you want to play directly on the phone. It basically moves all browsing to the device, which they're pretty good at, and leaves just display to the chromecast. I usually prefer it to clicking around on-screen with a hardware remote now.

ssmoot 11y ago
I get that. And it's great for work. But at home TV time is primarily family or parent-couple time. The act of browsing, previewing, and deciding is a part of that. It's the same reason the WiiU app navigation is a big minus for me. I don't ever want to see that Mii lobby thing. Don't know what the hell it's for. Just put the apps on the TV like every other console. Mirror on the gamepad if you want. That's fine. But don't try to force it as the default option to the exclusion of the rest of the party. (Yes I realize you can "cast" it up to the TV, but is it sticky? I don't know, because it still seems to routinely annoy by going back to the gamepad.) Anyways, yes, the Chromecast has it's place. And it's a nice fall-back when the AppleTV in the conference room is unreliable because you've got a dozen of them around the office, 3 different WiFi networks nobody knows which to be on, and the AppleTV disconnects every five minutes while your laptop doesn't realize and getting reconnected takes a minute or two and ugh it's just so frustrating... Never have that problem at home.