3 ms·
Maybe because Apple is the one named company that refused to comment. "(Samsung) SDI, told Amnesty it doesn’t do direct business with the major Chinese supplie
by DrScump 11y ago
Maybe because Apple is the one named company that refused to comment.
"(Samsung) SDI, told Amnesty it doesn’t do direct business with the major Chinese suppliers mentioned in the report and that they aren’t in its supply chain."
- Malic 11y agoWe've seen this before. Apple's silence in the past is because 1) they are doing their due diligence in fact gathering and 2) if change is necessary, coming up with a plan to do so. Meaning you'll hear nothing from them until they have planned, prepared and can respond in detail. (Supporting Reference: http://www.macworld.com/article/1159548/apple_crisis_management.html http://www.macworld.com/article/1159548/apple_crisis_managem...)
- DrScump 11y agothey are doing their due diligence They are claiming that they try to do their due diligence -- not the same thing.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]