3 ms·
To represent the case for dynamic languages as "the speed at which you can physically type code" is a straw man.
by pekk 11y ago
To represent the case for dynamic languages as "the speed at which you can physically type code" is a straw man.
- dgritsko 11y agoI agree, I think there are many more issues to consider. However, the OP seemed to be focusing on that particular argument, hence my comment. A few examples: "The results were that the people using the dynamic version of the language got stuff done much quicker" "it took less time to find those errors [in the statically typed language] than it did to write the type safe code in the first place [in the dynamically typed language]." "[programs written in]" dynamic languages took significantly less effort to create (less time)"